The difference between microphones with transformer vs. transformerless output can in short be outlined as:
|
Transformer |
Transformerless |
Sensitivity |
Lower |
Higher |
Noise immunity |
Higher |
Lower |
Cable drive capacity |
Longer |
Shorter |
Low frequency handling |
Less Precise |
Good |
Microphone examples in this article features the well known Type 4006 with output transformer versus the acoustical identical but transformerless Type 4003 with the PCC4000, which ensures an impedance balanced output.
Sensitivity
In most microphone transformer designs the signal is transformed downwards. A transformer will reduce the sensitivity of the microphone with the same ratio as the signal is transformed down, as the sensitivity specification concerns the microphone's output signal in relation to the pressure on the diaphragm (mV/Pa).
Diaphragm Size |
Small |
Medium |
Large |
4004 |
4003 |
4041-S |
(Ø12mm) |
(Ø16mm) |
(Ø24mm) |
Self Noise |
Higher |
Lower |
Lowest |
24 dB (A) |
15 dB (A) |
7 dB (A) |
Sensitivity
The sensitivity of the large and more compliant microphone diaphragm is generally higher than the small and stiff diaphragm. The large diaphragm is easier to move, even with low sound pressure levels, and will therefore provide a larger output.
Microphone |
4006 |
4003 + PCC4000 |
Transformer |
4:1 |
- |
Sensitivity |
10 mV/Pa |
40 mV/Pa |
Noise immunity
Noise immunity on balanced audio lines is totally dependant on how well the in- and output impedances are balanced and the common mode rejection ratio of the audio input channel. The balanced audio transformer introduces a higher common mode rejection ratio than any other electric circuit and is perfect for balancing loads. Using in- and output transformers for balancing audio signal lines will provide the highest possible immunity against common mode induced noise on the audio lines. Transformerless microphone preamplifiers will from the mere tolerance of the electric components introduce a slightly unbalanced load on the audio lines. The unbalanced load will allow a percentage of the induced noise to appear in different mode, which therefore not will be rejected by the input channel.
Cable drive capability
When a signal is transformed down the signal voltage becomes lower according to the conversion ratio of the transformer, while the signal current becomes accordingly higher. The increased signal current will increase the microphone's ability to drive long cables before noticeable signal deterioration occurs.
Microphone |
4006 |
4003 + PCC4000 |
Transformer |
Yes |
No |
Cable drive capacity |
300 mt. |
100 mt. |
Low frequency handling
Transformers will introduce some low frequency distortion, as transformers are in danger of becoming saturated by the high energy in the low frequency signals. This fact will also influence the lower limiting frequency (LLF) of the microphone as illustrated below.
Microphone |
4006 |
4003 + PCC4000 |
Transformer |
Yes |
No |
Lower Limiting Frequency |
20 Hz |
10 Hz |
Conclusion
Both transformerless as well as transformer output design have different advantages and disadvantages. This is illustrated in the table below. For this reason DPA offers both types of preamplifier design. It should, be noted however, that the potential drawbacks of the transformerless design illustrated here, may be eliminated through the use of a Hi-voltage Microphone Amplifier (e.g. Type HMA4000), when placed near the microphone.
|
Transformer |
Transformerless |
4006 |
4003 + PCC4000 |
Sensitivity |
Lower (10 mV/Pa) |
Higher (40 mV/Pa) |
Noise immunity |
Higher |
Lower |
Cable drive capacity |
Longer (300 mt) |
Shorter (100 mt) |
Low frequency handling |
Less precise at high SPL's
(LLF 20Hz) |
Good (LLF 10Hz) |