Bilgi>Transformer Vs Transformerless Output
Transformer Vs Transformerless Output
The difference between microphones with transformer vs. transformerless output can in short be outlined as:

 
Transformer
Transformerless
Sensitivity
Lower
Higher
Noise immunity
Higher
Lower
Cable drive capacity
Longer
Shorter
Low frequency handling
Less Precise
Good


Microphone examples in this article features the well known Type 4006 with output transformer versus the acoustical identical but transformerless Type 4003 with the PCC4000, which ensures an impedance balanced output.

Sensitivity

In most microphone transformer designs the signal is transformed downwards. A transformer will reduce the sensitivity of the microphone with the same ratio as the signal is transformed down, as the sensitivity specification concerns the microphone's output signal in relation to the pressure on the diaphragm (mV/Pa).

Diaphragm Size
Small
Medium
Large
4004
4003
4041-S
(Ø12mm)
(Ø16mm)
(Ø24mm)
Self Noise
Higher
Lower
Lowest
24 dB (A)
15 dB (A)
7 dB (A)


Sensitivity

The sensitivity of the large and more compliant microphone diaphragm is generally higher than the small and stiff diaphragm. The large diaphragm is easier to move, even with low sound pressure levels, and will therefore provide a larger output.

Microphone
4006
4003 + PCC4000
Transformer
4:1
-
Sensitivity
10 mV/Pa
40 mV/Pa


Noise immunity

Noise immunity on balanced audio lines is totally dependant on how well the in- and output impedances are balanced and the common mode rejection ratio of the audio input channel. The balanced audio transformer introduces a higher common mode rejection ratio than any other electric circuit and is perfect for balancing loads. Using in- and output transformers for balancing audio signal lines will provide the highest possible immunity against common mode induced noise on the audio lines. Transformerless microphone preamplifiers will from the mere tolerance of the electric components introduce a slightly unbalanced load on the audio lines. The unbalanced load will allow a percentage of the induced noise to appear in different mode, which therefore not will be rejected by the input channel.

Cable drive capability

When a signal is transformed down the signal voltage becomes lower according to the conversion ratio of the transformer, while the signal current becomes accordingly higher. The increased signal current will increase the microphone's ability to drive long cables before noticeable signal deterioration occurs.

Microphone
4006
4003 + PCC4000
Transformer
Yes
No
Cable drive capacity
300 mt.
100 mt.


Low frequency handling

Transformers will introduce some low frequency distortion, as transformers are in danger of becoming saturated by the high energy in the low frequency signals. This fact will also influence the lower limiting frequency (LLF) of the microphone as illustrated below.

Microphone
4006
4003 + PCC4000
Transformer
Yes
No
Lower Limiting Frequency
20 Hz
10 Hz


Conclusion

Both transformerless as well as transformer output design have different advantages and disadvantages. This is illustrated in the table below. For this reason DPA offers both types of preamplifier design. It should, be noted however, that the potential drawbacks of the transformerless design illustrated here, may be eliminated through the use of a Hi-voltage Microphone Amplifier (e.g. Type HMA4000), when placed near the microphone.

Transformer
Transformerless
4006
4003 + PCC4000
Sensitivity
Lower (10 mV/Pa)
Higher (40 mV/Pa)
Noise immunity
Higher
Lower
Cable drive capacity
Longer (300 mt)
Shorter (100 mt)
Low frequency handling
Less precise at high SPL's (LLF 20Hz)
Good (LLF 10Hz)